It may surprise you how many traders and fund managers have a history or hobby involving games of chance—blackjack, poker, even roulette.
Some have done exceptionally well. But let’s be clear: there is a vast difference between gambling and professional fund management.
Still, what draws many quantitatively-minded investors to both is the common thread: statistics, probabilities, and identifying inefficiencies.
From the Casino Floor to Wall Street
Names like Ed Thorp, Bill Benter, Blair Hull, David E. Shaw, Jim Simons and Nassim Nicholas Taleb all illustrate the fascinating overlap between gambling strategy and quantitative finance. Many of these figures either came from professional gambling backgrounds or applied gambling-related statistical models to financial markets.
Imagine walking into a casino where the blackjack shoe has an unusually high number of face cards—or discovering a roulette wheel biased just enough to favour a specific number sector. These small statistical edges can be exploited over time.
That is precisely the mindset we apply at Alpha-Elite. While our system is far more sophisticated than a game of cards, our approach is driven by stacking the odds relentlessly in our favour—before we even deploy our core quantitative model.
This thinking isn't just theoretical; it’s something any serious investor can apply.
1. Stocks Already Offer a Statistical Edge
We begin with a basic but powerful observation: equities have outperformed every other major asset class over the long term—be it gold, silver, commodities, real estate, currencies or even bonds.
According to historical data, global equities have delivered real returns in the range of 6–7% annually over the last century. Simply choosing to invest in stocks already places the investor on the statistically favourable side of the ledger.
2. Equities Have a Built-In Bull Market Bias
Unlike commodity or currency markets—where supply and demand can push prices in either direction—the stock market benefits from a long-term structural bias to the upside.
Why? Because equities represent ownership in companies with a mission to grow: revenues, profits, customer bases, product lines. More importantly, the market is underpinned by mandatory, recurring buying from:
Pension and retirement funds
Endowments
Sovereign wealth funds
Insurance companies
Index-tracking ETFs and mutual funds
Trusts and fiduciary managers
These massive, non-speculative inflows contribute to a consistent upward drift over time—despite short-term volatility.
3. Developed Markets: The Historical Outperformers
While emerging markets may offer the illusion of diversification and growth potential, historical data shows that developed markets—especially the US and Europe—have consistently outperformed on both return and risk-adjusted bases.
Moreover, globalisation has led to higher correlation among global markets. Diversifying into emerging markets no longer delivers the uncorrelated benefits it once did.
Thus, focusing our exposure on the most stable, proven equity markets further tilts the odds in our favour.
4. Size Matters: Why Large Caps Win More Often
While it’s tempting to chase meteoric returns from small-cap and mid-cap stocks, long-term evidence favours large-cap stocks.
These companies are generally more stable, liquid, and resilient—especially during downturns.
Large Caps tend to benefit from scale, access to capital, strong corporate governance, and brand strength. Over time, they provide a superior risk-adjusted return with lower volatility.
At Alpha-Elite, we deliberately invest only in Large Caps to reduce fragility and increase reliability of returns.
5. Then We Add Momentum and Conviction
Even before we apply our core strategy—monthly momentum-based selection—we’ve already stacked a series of statistical edges in our favour:
Asset class (equities)
Structural market inflows (pension and institutional demand)
Market selection (developed)
Capitalisation bias (Large Cap)
To this, we add:
Momentum: Riding trends backed by real money flows and investor behaviour
Concentration: Investing in a select group of high-conviction stocks rather than diluting our edge across a sprawling portfolio
The result: a repeatable, robust system that behaves like a probability machine.
The Caveat: It’s not that easy
Now, let’s not be seduced by the metaphor. Just because the market might be rigged in your favour, doesn’t mean success is easy or guaranteed.
To turn odds into results, you still need:
A long-term time horizon
Sound risk management and capital allocations
Psychological resilience, especially during drawdowns
Discipline and consistency
Without these core principles, even the most statistically favourable system can fail.
The house edge only works when you stay in the game long enough.
References
Carlson, Ben. "Historical Returns for Stocks, Bonds, Cash, Real Estate and Gold." A Wealth of Common Sense, 2 January 2025.
Silverhall Wealth. "Long-Run Asset Returns: A Deep Dive into Historical Real and Nominal Returns." Silverhall Wealth.
Cambridge Judge Business School. "Report: Stocks Have Far Outperformed Over the Past 125 Years." Cambridge Judge Business School, 2025.
Bessembinder, H. (2018). "Do Stocks Outperform Treasury Bills?" Journal of Financial Economics, 129(3), 440–457.
Siegel, J. J. (2014). Stocks for the Long Run: The Definitive Guide to Financial Market Returns & Long-Term Investment Strategies (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Gompers, P. A., & Metrick, A. (2001). "Institutional Investors and Equity Prices." The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 229–259.
Sushko, V., & Turner, G. (2018). "The Implications of Passive Investing for Securities Markets." BIS Quarterly Review, March 2018.
Hirshleifer, D. (2001). "Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing." The Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1533–1597.
Malkiel, B. G. (2003). "The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59–82.
Dimson, E., Marsh, P., & Staunton, M. (2023). "Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2023." Credit Suisse Research Institute.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2012). "Size, Value, and Momentum in International Stock Returns." Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 457–472.
Bekaert, G., Hodrick, R. J., & Zhang, X. (2009). "International Stock Return Comovements." The Journal of Finance, 64(6), 2591–2626.
Forbes, K. J., & Rigobon, R. (2002). "No Contagion, Only Interdependence: Measuring Stock Market Comovements." The Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2223–2261.
Goetzmann, W. N., Li, L., & Rouwenhorst, K. G. (2005). "Long-Term Global Market Correlations." The Journal of Business, 78(1), 1–38.
Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., & Zhang, X. (2006). "The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns." The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259–299.
Ibbotson, R. G., & Idzorek, T. M. (2014). "Dimensions of Popularity." The Journal of Portfolio Management, 40(5), 68–77.
Chordia, T., Roll, R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2001). "Market Liquidity and Trading Activity." The Journal of Finance, 56(2), 501–530.